Web Survey Bibliography
Sampling matching is a new methodology for the selection of study samples from pools of opt-in respondents. This methodology addresses the primary substantive and technical issues of how large, but unrepresentative,
panels can be used to construct representative study samples for particular target populations. The procedure uses a listing or enumeration of the population that can be obtained from large scale consumer and voter databases that have been developed in recent years. The existence of such data has not been exploited in previous Internet research. On both a theoretical and a practical level, this approach substantially improves upon existing weighting procedures. As validation, we show how this procedure performed in predicting the outcome of the 2005 California special election.
Business material
Web survey bibliography - Internet access Panels (431)
- Pilot study to recruite a sample for an online panel: Effects of contact mode, incentives and information...; 2007; Scherpenzeel, A.
- Multiple imputation: review of theory, implementation and software; 2007; Harel, O., Zhou, X. H.
- Modes, trends, and content: A comparison of the 2003 HRS internet survey with HRS 2002 and 2004 Core...; 2007; Weir, D.
- Lessons learned: Converting a telephone survey panel to an internet panel; 2007; Roe, D. J., Stockdale, J., Farrelly, M., Heinrich, T.
- Survey Research in a Wireless World; 2007; Pazurik, A., Cameron, M. R.
- Visualizing Personal Networks: Working with Participant-aided Sociograms; 2007; Hogan, B., Carrasco, J. A., Wellman, B.
- ONLINE DATA COLLECTION – SOLUTION OR BAND-AID?; 2007; Crassweller, A., Williams, D., Thompson, I.
- Effects of Offering Web Questionnaires as an Option in Enterprise Surveys: the Swedish Experience; 2007; Erikson, J., Furubjelke, E.
- Boosting Response Rates: Are There Optimal Times to Email Respondents?; 2007; Bennett-Harper, S., O'Brien, J., Levin, K., Davis, B., Shipp, S., Campbell, S., Sienkiewicz, R.
- Compare and contrast - Study looks at online vs. offline multicultural research; 2007; Farrar, T., Schwartz, N., Mayor, N., Anthony, D., Faas, T.
- Best practices for online qualitative research; 2007; Stevens, B.
- Dutch Online Panel Comparison Study (NOPVO); 2006; R. van Ossenbruggen; T. Vonk; P. Willems
- Web 2.0 & panels. The shift from lectures to conversations; 2006; Cook, M., Buckley, N.
- Understanding people. Sample matching; 2006; Rivers, D.
- The effect of conditioning when re-interviewing; 2006; Cartwright, T., Nancarrow, C.
- The anonymous elect. Market research through online access panels; 2006; Postoaca, A.
- Sample matching. Representative sampling from Internet panels; 2006; Rivers, D.
- Greenfield unveils real-time sampling; 2006
- Weighting an Internet Panel Survey on Drug Use and Abuse; 2006; Gordek, H., Williams, Ri. L., Dai, L.
- Propensity Score Adjustment as a Weighting Scheme for Volunteer Panel Web Surveys; 2006; Lee, Su.
- Determinanten der Rücklaufquote in Online-Panels; 2005; Batanic, B., Moser, K.
- The professional respondent problem in online panel surveys today; 2005; Fulgoni, G.
- Satisficing behavior in online panelists; 2005; Downes-Le Guin, T.
- Panel proliferation and quality concerns; 2005; Faasse, J.
- Conducting longitudinal studies; 2004; Bauer, K. W.
- Response and Field Period Effects: The Effect of Time in Online Market Research and Consequences for...; 2004; Basso Larsen, R., Rathod, S.
- Statistical Estimation Methods in Volunteer Panel Web Surveys; 2004; Lee, Su.
- On-line qualitative market research: Interviewing the world at a fingertip; 2002; Scholl, N., Mulders, S., Drent, R.
- Predicting the future of consumer panels; 2002; Wansink, B., Sudman, S.
- Doec propensity score weighting work for Web Surveys; 2002; Forsman, G., Varedian, M.
- Ethische Dimensionen der Online-Forschung; 2001; Dzeyk, W.
- Panel Bias from Attrition and Conditioning: A Case Study of the Knowledge Networks Panel; 2001; Clinton, J. D.